By the conditions of the competition, the membership of experts committee being formed strictly in accordance with the original methodics. All experts are guarantee the qualitative and unprejudiced valuation of contest’s participants with their professionalism and the good name.

Specialists of 2015 in “Drinks” category(19)
View “Vitaly Anastas’ev's” profile
sales manager
Voted in 22 nominations.
View “Tamara Gerasimenko's” profile
Chief in the “FLAT-cafe” (Kyiv)
Flat cafe
Voted in 131 nominations.
Abstained in 1 of them.
View “Sergey Mukolayovuch Gun’Ko's” profile
Associate Professor of storage, processing and standardization of plant products National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ph.D.
Voted in 46 nominations.
View “Eduard Nasyrov's” profile
Незалежний кулінарний блогер, експерт у «Сніданок на 1+1», автор проекту Happyfood
Voted in 89 nominations.
Abstained in 1 of them.
View “Igor Pomazan's” profile
Beverage technologist, BARlife.com.ua
Voted in 39 nominations.
Abstained in 1 of them.
View “Dmitriy Popov's” profile
Шеф-повар (диплом школи Мішлєн) кафе-клубу Дому Бабеля (м. Одеса), фіналіст проекту «Пекельна кухня» на 1+1
Rated the contestants in 53 nominations.
View “Volodymir Shamaev's” profile
Спеціаліст з професійної технології кави еспресо, автор блогу про каву coffeezoom.com.ua
Voted in 3 nominations.
View “Volodymyr Shevyakov's” profile
Управитель «Портер Пабу»
Gave vote in 10 nominations.
View “Іван Бачурін's” profile
Шеф-сомельє ресторану WHISKY CORNER
Gave vote in 7 nominations.
View “Marina Gritsenko's” profile Журналістка порталу Gloss.ua
Сіті-гайд Gloss.ua
Rated the contestants in 46 nominations.
View “Віра Оболкіна's” profile Кондитерські вироби. Інститут післядипломної освіти,
(курс по підготовці експертів харчових продуктів та напоїв)
Rated the contestants in 11 nominations.

Note The information provided on this page was actual during the contest’s researches in 2015, and currently this is an archived information. Keep in mind that time does not stand still: people make a career, change jobs or even a profession, so accordingly, the information about the jury members could subsequently change during the time.