Catering :: Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2016

Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2016 in category

Delivery & shipping / Catering

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	2	Пузата хата	21.05%	5

2.	1	Фігаро-Кейтерінг	15.79%	3.75

3.		Гетьман-Фуршет	10.53%	2.50

4.	~	Arôme	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	Atelier catering	5.26%	1.25

4.	3	Crystal Catering	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	Jam Catering	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	Shooters Кейтеринг	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	V.I.P. Catering	5.26%	1.25

4.		Живот-кейтеринг	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	НЯМ-НЯМ	5.26%	1.25

4.		Пикник	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	Райский кейтеринг	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	Ройал Кейтерінг Сервіс	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	Соль и Перец	5.26%	1.25

4.	3	Хата рибака	5.26%	1.25

4.	~	Хорив	5.26%	1.25

–.		Best Events Catering	0.00%	0

–.		Docker Catering	0.00%	0

–.		Mastergood кейтеринг	0.00%	0

–.		Mozart Catering	0.00%	0

–.	3	Premier Palace Catering	0.00%	0

–.		SUN WAY	0.00%	0

–.		ЄвроЛанч	0.00%	0

–.		Агентство ПИР	0.00%	0

–.		Банкет-Холл	0.00%	0

–.		Бизнес Кейтеринг	0.00%	0

–.	3	Вкусный ресторан	0.00%	0

–.		Киев Кейтеринг	0.00%	0

–.	3	Киев Премьер Кейтеринг	0.00%	0

–.		Классик	0.00%	0

–.	3	Ле Гранд Кафе	0.00%	0

–.		Опалкова хата	0.00%	0

–.		Операция–Ы	0.00%	0

–.		Орион Кейтеринг	0.00%	0

–.		Сурова Кейтеринг	0.00%	0

–.		Фист дэй	0.00%	0

–.		ФОКС-кейтеринг	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2016, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.