Kids’ store :: The total survey results of 2015 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2015 by the integrated assestment in category

Stores, supermarkets, trade centers / Kids’ store

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		Антошка	5

2.	3	Chicco	3.77

3.	2	Будинок іграшок	3.53

4.	5	Епік	3.42

5.	4	Дитячий світ	3.40

6.	13	Babyzone	2.66

7.	10	Планета іграшок	2.13

8.		Тигрес	1.73

9.		Пелікан	1.42

10.	16	Bаby Marlen	1.35

11.	6	Бебі-Бум	1.30

12.		Кенгуру	1.29

13.	15	Казка нова	1.18

14.	17	Сімба	0.95

15.	23	Мілана	0.87

16.	7	Mothercare	0.73

17.	19	Мішутка	0.692

18.		Даніель	0.687

19.	22	Шалун	0.219

20.	25	Waikiki	0.178

21.	24	Pampolina	0.121

22.	21	I Pinco Pallino	0.115

23.	20	Парад игрушек	0.098

24.	11	Lapin House	0.069

24.	14	Miss Blumarine	0.069

24.	22	Наследник	0.069

–.		~~Orchestra~~	0

The store which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the most successful Ukrainian trading establishment of 2015 in the “Kids’ store” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2015, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.