Middle-eastern cuisine restaurant :: Consumers survey results of 2013

Consumers survey results of 2013 in category

City Life / Pubs, bars, restaurants / Middle-eastern cuisine restaurant

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Тюбетейка	33.96%	5

2.	6	Маракеш	30.19%	4.56

3.	2	Шахерезада	20.75%	2.96

4.		Крим	9.43%	2.80

5.	3	Мармарис	15.09%	2.29

6.	4	Караван	13.21%	1.91

7.		Шафран	11.32%	1.62

8.		Такі-Маки	11.32%	1.56

9.	7	Сарай-Бабай	9.43%	1.53

10.	8	Нью Бомбей	7.55%	1.20

11.		Tike	7.55%	1.13

12.		Харбин	1.89%	1.07

13.	8	China White	5.66%	0.93

14.	~	Sumosan	5.66%	0.87

14.	~	Волшебная Лампа	5.66%	0.87

14.	~	Доверсоль	5.66%	0.87

17.	~	Touch Cafe	3.77%	0.60

17.	5	Нирвана Lounge	3.77%	0.60

17.	8	Сезам	3.77%	0.60

17.	~	Сытый Самурай	3.77%	0.60

21.	8	Цимес	3.77%	0.56

22.	~	Ширван Шах	1.89%	0.22

–.		King David	0.00%	0

–.		Lun Van	0.00%	0

–.		Імператор	0.00%	0

–.		Аріранг	0.00%	0

–.		Волин Хаус	0.00%	0

–.		Гімалаї	0.00%	0

–.		Дю Лонг	0.00%	0

–.		Емір	0.00%	0

–.	8	Клеопатра	0.00%	0

–.		Сеул	0.00%	0

–.		Ханой	0.00%	0

–.		Шангрила	0.00%	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2013, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Middle-eastern cuisine restaurant”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2013, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.