Beauty :: Experts Jury survey results of 2010

The category has been excluded from the voting of July 5, 2019 by decision of organizers of the “Favorites of Success” Award, and it’s currently inactive. Here are shown an old survey results for 2010.

Experts Jury survey results of 2010 in category

Profile publications / Beauty

1.	2	Les Nouvelles Esthetiques Україна (Естет, івент-медійна компанія)	37.50%	5

2.	3	Makeup&You Professional (Ес Енд Ей груп, Агентство маркетингових коммуникацій)	31.25%	4.17

3.	4	Votre Beaute (Publishing House United Media Holding)	25.00%	3.33

3.	4	Косметолог (Ес Енд Ей груп, Агентство маркетингових коммуникацій)	25.00%	3.33

5.	4	HAND & nails + Ногтевой сервис (Естет, івент-медійна компанія)	18.75%	2.50

5.	2	You Professional (Естет, івент-медійна компанія)	18.75%	2.50

5.	1	Your Hair (Естет, івент-медійна компанія)	18.75%	2.50

5.	3	Зеркало моды (Ес Енд Ей груп, Агентство маркетингових коммуникацій)	18.75%	2.50

9.	3	Kosmetik International (Естет, івент-медійна компанія)	12.50%	1.67

–.	3	Wellness (Інтернешнл Медіа)	0.00%	0

–.		Косметический рынок СЕГОДНЯ (Естет, івент-медійна компанія)	0.00%	0

–.	3	Ногтевая эстетика (Ес Енд Ей груп, Агентство маркетингових коммуникацій)	0.00%	0

–.	4	Ножницы – Scissors (Vladimir Tarasyuk Hair Studio)	0.00%	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of industry specialists is the best choice in 2010, recommendation of an experts #1 in the category “Magazine about beauty”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2010, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.