Air freshener :: The total survey results of 2017 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2017 by the integrated assestment in category

Household chemicals / Air freshener

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.	2	Glade (SC Johnson)	5

2.	1	Air Wick (Reckitt Benckiser)	4.69

3.	5	Frosch (Ректіс)	2.06

4.	12	Garden (Арнест Україна)	0.94

5.	11	Chirton (Conril)	0.69

6.	7	Symphony (Арнест Україна)	0.53

7.	3	Amway Green Meadows (Amway Ukraine)	0.51

8.	17	Oust (SC Johnson)	0.43

–.	6	~~Breezy (Firm Leda)~~	~~0.42~~

–.	15	~~Aromania (Firm Leda)~~	~~0.340~~

9.	13	Breesal (Upeco)	0.338

10.	8	Ambi-Pur (Гарант Дістріб’юшен)	0.330

–.	4	~~Frost (Kalina)~~	~~0.305~~

11.	10	Flower Shop (Fenix Integrated Services)	0.266

12.	14	Air Wins (Бытпром)	0.149

13.	9	NewBrite (Neways)	0.136

14.	16	Nago	0.131

15.	18	VIZ (Група «Евріка»)	0.110

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2017 in the “Air freshener” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2017, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.