Anti-dandruff shampoo :: Consumers survey results of for 4 quarter of 2017

Consumers survey results of for 4 quarter of 2017 in category

Cosmetics / Anti-dandruff shampoo

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Сульсена (Амальгама Люкс)	31.03%	5

2.		Head & Shoulders (Procter & Gamble)	20.69%	3.33

3.		Біокон – Сила волосся	18.97%	3.06

4.	9	Avon	15.52%	2.50

4.	3	Nivea (Байєрсдорф Україна)	15.52%	2.50

4.	5	Vichy (L’Oréal Paris)	15.52%	2.50

7.	4	Aloe Vera (Dr. Sante)	12.07%	1.94

7.	6	Зеленая аптека (Ельфа)	12.07%	1.94

7.	8	Кетоконазол+Zn (Фармацевтична компанія «Ельфа»)	12.07%	1.94

10.	8	Clear (Unilever)	8.62%	1.39

10.	7	Garnier Fructis (L’Oréal Paris)	8.62%	1.39

10.	9	LUSH	8.62%	1.39

13.	9	Bio Pharma (Альянс Красоты)	6.90%	1.11

13.	7	Syoss (Henkel Ukraine)	6.90%	1.11

15.	9	Ducray	5.17%	0.83

15.	8	Seborin (Henkel Ukraine)	5.17%	0.83

15.	7	Ромашка лекарственная и Репейник (Pharma Group LTD)	5.17%	0.83

18.	10	Alpifresh (Lenhart Kosmetik)	3.45%	0.56

18.	9	Himalaya herbals (Himalaya Drug Co.)	3.45%	0.56

18.	~	Satinique (Емвей Україна)	3.45%	0.56

18.	10	Виторал (Аромат)	3.45%	0.56

22.	8	BC Bonacure (Henkel Ukraine)	1.72%	0.28

22.		Item (SDM-Pharma)	1.72%	0.28

22.	~	Lanier Dandruff Control (Плацент Формула)	1.72%	0.28

–.		Est Etoile	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2017, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.