Antiviral medication :: Consumers survey results of 2012

The category has been excluded from the voting of April 8, 2013 by decision of organizers of the “Favorites of Success” Award, and it’s currently inactive. Here are shown an old survey results for 2012.

Consumers survey results of 2012 in category

Antiviral medications / Antiviral medication

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Amizon (Farmak)	36.21%	5

2.		Афлубін	29.31%	4.17

3.	6	Оксолінова мазь	25.00%	4

4.		Arbidol	23.28%	3.37

5.		Аміксин IC	22.41%	3.21

6.	3	Анаферон (Materia Medica – Ukraine)	16.38%	2.36

7.	8	Енгістол (Heel)	12.07%	1.90

8.	12	Zovirax (GlaxoSmithKline)	7.76%	1.19

9.	7	Герпевір (Arterium Corporation)	6.90%	0.91

10.	15	Immustat	4.31%	0.82

11.	10	Viferon (Feron)	5.17%	0.81

12.	13	Лавомакс (Nizhpharm)	5.17%	0.73

13.		Оксолін-Дарница	5.17%	0.70

14.	16	Ацикловір (Nizhpharm)	3.45%	0.65

15.	9	Лаферон – ФармБіотек Назальний	4.31%	0.64

16.	17	Кагоцел (Ніармедик Плюс)	2.59%	0.46

17.	11	Ацик (Sandoz)	1.72%	0.29

–.	14	~~Aciclovir (Farmak)~~	~~1.72%~~	~~0.24~~

18.		Альтабор	1.72%	0.18

19.		Алломедин	0.86%	0.09

The competitor which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and the most successful Ukrainian medication of 2012 in the “Antiviral medication” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2012, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.