Milk product based on bifidobacterias :: Consumers survey results of 2018

Consumers survey results of 2018 in category

Milk products / Milk product based on bifidobacterias

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Активиа (Danone)	43.91%	5

2.		Actimel (Danone)	26.96%	3.09

3.		Закваска Яготинська (Yagotinsky milk factory)	21.74%	2.51

4.		Закваска Vivo (Vivo)	19.13%	2.16

5.		Біла лінія (Білоцерківський молочний комбінат)	8.48%	1.90

6.	5	Геролакт (Yagotinsky milk factory)	14.13%	1.60

7.	8	Біфілайф – Волошкове поле (Yuria)	9.78%	1.11

8.	7	Закваска Good Food	9.35%	1.06

9.	6	Злагода (Pridneprovsky combinate)	8.04%	0.91

–.	9	~~Імунеле (Wimm-Bill-Dann)~~	~~7.17%~~	~~0.83~~

10.		Біфілайф – Добряна (Мілкіленд)	6.52%	0.78

11.		Лактония Imun+ (Лакталіс)	5.87%	0.71

12.		Глечик біо простокваша (Hercules)	4.57%	0.54

–.	~	~~Біо Баланс (Danone)~~	~~1.09%~~	~~0.50~~

13.	11	Закваска «Мгарська» – Гармонія (Lubensky milk factory)	3.91%	0.46

14.		Добриня біо простокваша (Геркулес)	3.26%	0.40

–.	~	~~Закваска Болгарська рецептура «Простоквашино» (Данон)~~	~~0.65%~~	~~0.30~~

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2018, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Milk product based on bifidobacterias”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2018, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.