Food for cats :: Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2013

Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2013 in category

Pet products / Food for cats

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Whiskas (Mars)	39.29%	5

2.	1	Royal Canin (Роял Канін Україна)	32.14%	4.09

3.	2	Kitekat (Mars)	23.21%	2.95

4.		Purina (Nestlé)	19.64%	2.50

5.	3	Friskies (Nestlé)	17.86%	2.27

6.		Pro Plan (Nestlé)	12.50%	1.59

6.		Sheba (Mars)	12.50%	1.59

6.		Клуб 4 лапи (Кормотех)	12.50%	1.59

9.		Hill’s (Барбус)	8.93%	1.14

10.	8	Nutra Gold	5.36%	0.68

10.	7	Мяу! (Кормотех)	5.36%	0.68

12.	11	Acana (Animal Products Group)	3.57%	0.45

12.	8	Gourmet (Nestlé)	3.57%	0.45

12.	10	Mio-Mix	3.57%	0.45

12.	5	Nutra Mix (Титан-Рі)	3.57%	0.45

12.	10	Nutra Nuggets	3.57%	0.45

17.	12	1st Choice (УкрПет)	1.79%	0.23

17.	12	Advance	1.79%	0.23

17.	11	Bosch	1.79%	0.23

17.	12	Cat Cafe	1.79%	0.23

17.	11	Cat Chow (Nestlé)	1.79%	0.23

17.	7	Darling (Nestlé)	1.79%	0.23

17.	~	Diamond	1.79%	0.23

17.	~	Happy Cat	1.79%	0.23

17.	12	Iams (Медфарком-Центр, Офіційний дистриб’ютор P&G Pet Care)	1.79%	0.23

17.	~	Katinka	1.79%	0.23

–.	12	Ci-Ci	0.00%	0

–.		Eagle Pack	0.00%	0

–.		Hi-Ration	0.00%	0

–.	12	Nutro choice	0.00%	0

–.		Orijen (Animal Products Group)	0.00%	0

–.		Pro Pac	0.00%	0

–.		Proformance	0.00%	0

–.		Tuffy’s (Титан-Рі)	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2013, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.