Corn and peas :: The total survey results of 2007 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2007 by the integrated assestment in category

Preserved food / Corn and peas

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		Bonduelle	5

2.	3	Верес (ГК «Верес»)	3.19

3.	2	Чумак	2.80

4.	10	Globus (CECAB)	1.69

5.	6	Vernet (Bonduelle)	0.99

6.	4	Бабусин продукт (Агроспецпроект)	0.89

7.	9	Чемпіон	0.83

8.		Долина желаний (Veld)	0.76

9.	~	Чудо	0.665

10.		Премія (Fozzy Group)	0.659

11.	12	ASP (Агроспецпроект)	0.648

12.	13	Дари ланів (Hopak)	0.556

13.	8	Веселий фермер (Агроспецпроект)	0.506

14.	11	Котигорошко (ГК «Верес»)	0.358

15.	5	EKO (ЭКО Сервис)	0.332

–.	7	~~ARO~~	~~0.233~~

16.		Славпродукт	0.099

17.	14	Богуславка	0.064

18.	13	Пирятин	0.063

19.	8	Солоха	0.055

20.	13	Best Time (Bestcom)	0.053

–.		Oscar (Olive line)	0

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2007 in the “Preserved corn and peas” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2007, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.