The medication from diahrea :: Consumers survey results of 2016

Consumers survey results of 2016 in category

Digestive system and hepatology / The medication from diahrea

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	2	Sorbex (Валартін Фарма)	33.33%	5

2.	1	Смекта (Beaufour Ipsen Pharma)	31.88%	4.83

3.	6	Hylak forte (ratiopharm)	31.88%	4.48

4.	5	Enterosgelum (Kreoma-Pharm)	20.29%	3.11

5.	7	Регідрон (Orion Pharma)	17.39%	2.61

6.	3	Imodium (Johnson & Johnson)	17.39%	2.36

7.	4	Atoxil (Orisil-Pharm)	13.04%	1.95

8.	9	Лоперамід-Здоров’я (Pharmaceutical company “Zdorovya”)	11.59%	1.79

9.	10	Лопедіум (Sandoz)	8.70%	1.15

10.	11	Лоперамід-ЛХ (Лекхім)	7.25%	1.09

11.	19	Лакто (Progress pharma)	5.80%	0.93

12.	13	Ентерол (Біокодекс Україна)	5.80%	0.85

13.	8	Phosphalugel (Astellas Europe)	5.80%	0.83

14.	17	Лактусан (ТОВ “Феліцата Україна”)	4.35%	0.80

15.	16	Lacidofil (PharmUnion)	4.35%	0.73

16.	12	Діаремікс (Mili Healthcare)	4.35%	0.69

17.	~	Стоперан (EU Pharmacia)	4.35%	0.63

18.		Метеоспазміл (Lab. Mayoly Spindler)	2.90%	0.47

19.	14	Ентерофурил (Bosnalijek)	2.90%	0.36

20.	15	Мукофальк (Dr. Falk)	1.45%	0.27

The competitor which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and the most successful Ukrainian medication of 2016 in the “The drug from diahrea” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2016, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.