Food for dogs :: Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2019

Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2019 in category

Pet products / Food for dogs

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	3	Royal Canin (Роял Канін Україна)	20.69%	5

2.	1	Chappi (Mars)	18.97%	4.58

3.	1	Клуб 4 лапи (Кормотех)	17.24%	4.17

4.		Brit (Vafo Praha)	13.79%	3.33

4.	6	Darling (Nestlé)	13.79%	3.33

4.		Гав! (Кормотех)	13.79%	3.33

7.	5	Nutra Mix (Титан-Рі)	12.07%	2.92

7.		Pro Plan (Nestlé)	12.07%	2.92

7.	3	Purina (Nestlé)	12.07%	2.92

7.	~	Tuffy’s (Титан-Рі)	12.07%	2.92

11.	6	Леопольд	8.62%	2.08

12.	7	Advance	6.90%	1.67

12.	4	Dog Chow (Nestlé)	6.90%	1.67

12.	2	Optimeal (Swiss Pet Nutrition Group GmbH)	6.90%	1.67

12.	4	Pedigree (Mars)	6.90%	1.67

16.	6	1st Choice (УкрПет)	5.17%	1.25

16.	6	Aport	5.17%	1.25

16.	5	Canidae	5.17%	1.25

16.	5	Diamond	5.17%	1.25

16.	7	Grandorf	5.17%	1.25

16.	7	Happy Dog	5.17%	1.25

16.	5	Hill’s (Барбус)	5.17%	1.25

16.	7	Mera Dog	5.17%	1.25

16.	7	Nutra Gold	5.17%	1.25

25.	6	Acana (Animal Products Group)	3.45%	0.83

25.	7	Eagle Pack	3.45%	0.83

27.	6	Josera (Йозера Україна)	1.72%	0.42

27.	7	Nature’s Protection	1.72%	0.42

27.	7	Orijen (Animal Products Group)	1.72%	0.42

27.	6	Sportmix	1.72%	0.42

–.	6	Nutro choice	0.00%	0

–.		Trainer	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2019, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.