Economy class (A,B) :: Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2016

Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2016 in category

Cars: Economy class (A,B)

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	3	Skoda Fabia	24.39%	5

2.	4	Ford Fiesta	21.95%	4.50

3.	1	Volkswagen Polo	19.51%	4

4.	7	Nissan Micra	17.07%	3.50

5.	6	Opel Corsa	14.63%	3

6.	4	Audi A1	12.20%	2.50

6.	7	Kia Venga	12.20%	2.50

6.		Mazda 2	12.20%	2.50

9.	5	Chevrolet Aveo	9.76%	2

9.	~	Citroёn C3 Picasso	9.76%	2

9.	7	Kia Picanto	9.76%	2

12.	7	Fiat Punto	7.32%	1.50

12.	~	Hyundai i10	7.32%	1.50

12.	6	Hyundai i20	7.32%	1.50

12.	4	Skoda Spaceback	7.32%	1.50

12.	6	Suzuki Swift	7.32%	1.50

12.	2	Toyota Yaris	7.32%	1.50

18.	7	Fiat 500 (C, L, X etc)	4.88%	1

18.	7	Fiat Panda	4.88%	1

18.	3	Peugeot 208	4.88%	1

–.	~	~~BYD F0~~	~~4.88%~~	1

–.	7	~~Uz-Daewoo Matiz~~	~~4.88%~~	1

21.	~	Daihatsu Sirion	2.44%	0.50

21.	~	Geely GC2	2.44%	0.50

21.	~	Hyundai Verloster	2.44%	0.50

21.	7	Mitsubishi i-MiEV	2.44%	0.50

21.	7	Peugeot 107	2.44%	0.50

21.	7	Seat Ibiza	2.44%	0.50

21.	6	ЗАЗ Forza	2.44%	0.50

–.		Alfa MiTo	0.00%	0

–.		Great Wall Voleex C10	0.00%	0

–.		Lifan 320	0.00%	0

–.		Opel Adam	0.00%	0

–.		Renault Sandero	0.00%	0

–.		Suzuki Splash	0.00%	0

–.	7	ЗАЗ Vida	0.00%	0

–.	7	~~FAW v2~~	~~0.00%~~	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2016, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.