Electric meat grinder :: The total survey results of 2016 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2016 by the integrated assestment in category

Kitchen appliances and crockery / Electric meat grinder

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.	5	Kenwood	5

2.	6	Moulinex	4.943

3.	4	Braun	4.937

4.	2	Zelmer (БСХ Бош та Сіменс. Побутова техніка)	4.756

5.	1	Bosch	4.476

6.	3	DEX	3.186

7.	9	Panasonic	2.076

8.		Tefal	2.014

9.	11	Liberty	1.980

10.	7	Saturn	1.587

11.	24	Mirta	1.218

12.	15	De’Longhi	1.035

13.	21	Scarlett	0.962

14.		Аксион	0.899

15.	10	Gorenje	0.814

16.	18	Vitek	0.438

17.	22	Електрон	0.331

18.	16	Polaris	0.283

19.	20	Delfa	0.251

19.		Liberton	0.251

21.	19	Rotex	0.215

22.	~	Magio	0.194

23.	17	Clatronic	0.176

23.		VICO	0.176

25.	12	Bork	0.107

–.		Aurora	0

–.	13	Binatone	0

–.	23	Mystery	0

–.	25	Shivaki	0

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2016 in the “Electric meat grinder” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2016, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.