Glasses cleaner (windows, mirrors) :: Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2015

Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2015 in category

Cleaning products: Glasses cleaner (windows, mirrors)

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Mr Muscle (SC Johnson)	60.00%	5

2.		Clin (Henkel Ukraine)	28.42%	2.37

3.	4	Cif (Unilever)	16.84%	1.40

4.	3	Сан Клін	15.79%	1.32

5.	3	Frosch (Ректіс)	14.74%	1.23

6.	3	Gala (Procter & Gamble)	13.68%	1.14

7.	2	L.O.C. Plus (Емвей Україна)	11.58%	0.96

8.	~	Чистюня (Ельфа)	8.42%	0.70

9.	~	Domax	6.32%	0.53

9.	~	Test (Firm Leda)	6.32%	0.53

11.	~	Window plus (Gold Drop)	5.26%	0.44

12.	4	Sano	3.16%	0.26

12.	~	Snow Glass (Група «Евріка»)	3.16%	0.26

–.	~	~~GlasEFFEKT (Hagleitner)~~	~~3.16%~~	~~0.26~~

14.	4	Bingosil (Firm Leda)	2.11%	0.18

14.	~	Flower Shop (Fenix Integrated Services)	2.11%	0.18

14.	~	Silvia (Fenix Integrated Services)	2.11%	0.18

14.	5	Бджілка (НоваХім)	2.11%	0.18

14.	~	Ода-Лазур (DAKOS-T)	2.11%	0.18

19.	~	Gruen Green (OPM)	1.05%	0.09

19.	~	NewBrite (Neways)	1.05%	0.09

19.		SAMA (SV)	1.05%	0.09

19.	5	Біолайт (Науково-виробнича фірма Біолайт)	1.05%	0.09

19.	~	МилаМ	1.05%	0.09

19.	~	Ода (DAKOS-T)	1.05%	0.09

–.	5	~~Hagleitner (BonGrado)~~	~~1.05%~~	~~0.09~~

–.		Ratz Fatz (Чистый дом)	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2015, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.