Headphones :: Consumers survey results of 2017

Consumers survey results of 2017 in category

Audio and video appliances / Headphones

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Sony	35.48%	5

2.	3	Philips	30.65%	4.43

3.	2	Panasonic	29.84%	4.20

4.	5	Samsung	27.42%	3.85

5.	4	Koss (МікроТех)	24.19%	3.56

6.	7	Sennheiser (Індіго Мьюзік, Група компаній)	17.74%	2.50

7.	12	Xiaomi	12.90%	1.87

8.	14	Bravis	11.29%	1.70

9.	13	ERGO (Юг-Контракт)	10.48%	1.47

10.	13	Marshall	8.87%	1.371

–.	10	~~BBK~~	~~8.06%~~	~~1.370~~

11.	8	Sven	8.06%	1.327

12.	9	Genius	7.26%	1.214

13.	16	AKG	7.26%	1.021

14.	6	Logitech (ASBIS Україна)	6.45%	0.989

15.		X-Digital	4.84%	0.689

16.	22	Defender	3.23%	0.625

17.	20	Audio-Technica	4.03%	0.589

18.	11	Beats by Dr. Dre	3.23%	0.432

19.	22	Beyerdynamic	2.42%	0.413

20.	19	Krauler	2.42%	0.357

21.	24	Cosonic	1.61%	0.313

21.	23	Rapoo	1.61%	0.313

23.	19	Gamebird	2.42%	0.289

24.	17	Microlab	1.61%	0.257

25.	21	Canyon	0.81%	0.156

26.	21	Media-tech	0.81%	0.100

26.	18	Superlux	0.81%	0.100

–.	21	Pixus	0.00%	0

–.	25	Ritmix	0.00%	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2017, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Headphones”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2017, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.