Headphones :: Consumers survey results of 2019

Consumers survey results of 2019 in category

Audio and video appliances / Headphones

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Philips	27.15%	5

2.		Sony	28.05%	4.94

3.	5	Samsung	20.81%	3.87

4.		Panasonic	21.27%	3.77

5.	9	Xiaomi	14.93%	2.98

6.	12	Bravis	15.38%	2.54

7.	3	Koss (МікроТех)	14.48%	2.50

8.	10	ERGO (Юг-Контракт)	11.76%	2.12

9.	6	Genius	10.86%	2.02

10.	11	Sven	10.41%	1.84

11.	7	Sennheiser (Індіго Мьюзік, Група компаній)	9.05%	1.80

12.	8	Logitech (ASBIS Україна)	8.60%	1.41

13.		Marshall	7.24%	1.37

14.	24	Defender	5.43%	1.07

15.	28	Beyerdynamic	5.43%	1

16.	15	Canyon	4.98%	0.86

16.	22	Cosonic	4.98%	0.86

18.	14	Beats by Dr. Dre	5.43%	0.85

19.		Microlab	4.07%	0.77

20.	16	AKG	4.07%	0.70

21.		Gamebird	2.71%	0.45

22.	26	Superlux	2.71%	0.44

23.	17	X-Digital	2.26%	0.43

24.	18	Denon (МІРС)	2.26%	0.41

25.		Media-tech	2.26%	0.39

26.	23	Krauler	2.26%	0.37

27.	20	Audio-Technica	1.81%	0.36

28.	29	Rapoo	1.81%	0.30

29.	27	Pixus	1.36%	0.28

–.		Ritmix	0.00%	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2019, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Headphones”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2019, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.