The medication from heartburn :: Consumers survey results of 2010

Consumers survey results of 2010 in category

Digestive system and hepatology / The medication from heartburn

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Rennie (Bayer)	55.75%	5

2.		Maalox (Sanofi)	34.51%	3.34

3.	4	Алмагель (Balkanpharma)	22.12%	2.06

4.	7	Гастромакс (Mili Healthcare)	18.58%	1.93

5.	6	Motilium (Johnson & Johnson)	22.12%	1.90

6.	3	Phosphalugel (Astellas Europe)	16.81%	1.54

7.	5	Гастал (Pliva)	15.93%	1.39

8.		Gaviscon (Гавіскон)	10.62%	0.96

9.	11	Периліум (Genom Biotech)	4.42%	0.441

10.	13	Моторикс (Київський вітамінний завод)	4.42%	0.435

11.	9	Белалгін (Борщагівський ХФЗ)	4.42%	0.400

12.	19	Тальцид (Bayer)	3.54%	0.377

13.	17	Мотинол (Pharmascience)	3.54%	0.274

14.	~	Ланзап (Dr. Reddy’s)	1.77%	0.220

14.		Манті (EU Pharmacia)	1.77%	0.220

16.	15	Домперидон Гексал (Sandoz)	1.77%	0.184

–.	16	~~Перидон (Лекхім)~~	~~1.77%~~	~~0.172~~

17.	12	Ранигаст (Polpharma S.A.)	1.77%	0.117

18.		Домідон (Farmak)	0.88%	0.092

19.		Домрід (Kusum Pharm)	0.88%	0.059

–.	10	Домперидон-Стома (Стома)	0.00%	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2010, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “The drug from heartburn”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2010, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.