Imported sparkling wine (champagne) :: The total survey results of 2012 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2012 by the integrated assestment in category

Imported alcoholic drinks / Imported sparkling wine (champagne)

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		Martini Asti (Bacardi-Martini Group)	5

2.		Cricova (Ukrimport KV)	3.04

3.		Martini Rose (Bacardi-Martini Group)	2.728

4.	5	Taittinger	2.725

5.	6	Bagrationi (Олевер)	2

6.	11	G.H.Mumm (Pernod Ricard Ukraine)	1.702

7.	9	Veuve Clioquot (Марком)	1.374

8.	10	Perrier Jouet (Pernod Ricard Ukraine)	1.368

9.	4	Champagne Pol Roger	1.248

10.	8	Laurent-Perrier (Долмарт Україна)	1.123

11.	7	Louis Roederer	0.915

12.		Georges Duboeuf (Долмарт Україна)	0.902

13.	14	Basvinex (Ukrimport KV)	0.227

14.	13	Comte Audoin de Dampierre	0.044

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2012 in the “Imported sparkling wine / champagne” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2012, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.