Imported sparkling wine (champagne) :: Consumers survey results of 2018

Consumers survey results of 2018 in category

Imported alcoholic drinks / Imported sparkling wine (champagne)

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Martini Asti (Bacardi-Martini Group)	48.86%	5

2.		Martini Rose (Bacardi-Martini Group)	25.57%	2.60

3.		Bagrationi (Олевер)	18.75%	1.94

4.		Cricova (Ukrimport KV)	11.93%	1.24

5.		Cava	4.83%	0.89

6.	8	Telliani Valley	8.24%	0.85

7.	9	Café de Paris (Pernod Ricard Ukraine)	7.95%	0.81

8.	6	Gancia (Руст Україна)	7.39%	0.79

9.	5	Bazaleti (ДисНа (Дистрібуція Напоїв))	6.25%	0.64

10.	12	Champagne Pol Roger	5.11%	0.55

11.	10	Perrier Jouet (Pernod Ricard Ukraine)	5.11%	0.519

12.	14	Laurent-Perrier (Долмарт Україна)	5.11%	0.516

13.	11	Louis Roederer	4.83%	0.491

14.	7	Veuve Clioquot (Марком)	4.55%	0.452

15.	13	Georges Duboeuf (Долмарт Україна)	4.26%	0.432

16.	15	G.H.Mumm (Pernod Ricard Ukraine)	4.26%	0.424

17.	18	Basvinex (Ukrimport KV)	3.69%	0.371

18.	17	Comte Audoin de Dampierre	2.84%	0.283

19.	16	Taittinger	2.56%	0.272

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2018, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Imported sparkling wine / champagne”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2018, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.