Instant coffee :: Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2014

Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2014 in category

Soft drinks / Instant coffee

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Jacobs	60.00%	5

2.	3	Nescafé (Nestlé)	45.00%	3.75

3.	2	Carte Noire (Mondelēz Ukraine)	25.00%	2.08

3.	~	Чёрная карта (Strauss Coffee Service)	25.00%	2.08

5.	7	Tchibo	20.00%	1.67

5.	4	Петровская Слобода (ФЕС УКР)	20.00%	1.67

7.	4	Галка	15.00%	1.25

8.	9	Lacomba (УкрКофе)	10.00%	0.83

9.	8	Ambasador (Sucafina S.A)	5.00%	0.42

9.	8	Coffee-mate (Nestlé)	5.00%	0.42

9.	5	Davidoff (Асканія Дістрибьюшн)	5.00%	0.42

9.	10	Fort (Strauss Coffee Service)	5.00%	0.42

9.	~	Golden Eagle	5.00%	0.42

9.	4	Jardin (Orimi Trade Ukraine)	5.00%	0.42

9.	6	Maxwell House (Монделіс Україна)	5.00%	0.42

9.		Milagro	5.00%	0.42

9.	8	Roberto TOTTI (Strauss Coffee Service)	5.00%	0.42

9.	10	Добра кава (Solomia)	5.00%	0.42

9.	~	Добрыня	5.00%	0.42

9.	7	Жокей (Orimi Trade Ukraine)	5.00%	0.42

–.		Elite Platinum (Strauss Coffee Service)	0.00%	0

–.		Indiana Gold (Добриня-Дар)	0.00%	0

–.	10	Manhattan	0.00%	0

–.		Monterrey (Асканія Дістрибьюшн)	0.00%	0

–.	10	Індіана (Solomia)	0.00%	0

–.	9	Віденська кава	0.00%	0

–.	10	Вивальди (Exprim)	0.00%	0

–.	10	~~Indian instant coffee (Veld)~~	~~0.00%~~	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2014, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.