Minivan / Family car (MPV) :: Consumers survey results of 2011

Consumers survey results of 2011 in category

Cars: Minivan / Family car (MPV)

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Mazda 5	41.23%	5

2.		Volkswagen Touran	29.86%	3.53

3.	5	Skoda Roomster	24.64%	3.42

4.	~	Volkswagen Golf Plus	25.12%	3.05

5.	4	Ford Fusion	20.85%	2.90

6.	10	Fiat Doblò	19.43%	2.48

7.	3	Volkswagen Caddy Life	17.54%	2.28

8.	6	Ford C-MAX	15.64%	2.15

9.	8	Peugeot Partner Tepee	15.17%	1.95

10.	15	Citroёn C4 Picasso	14.69%	1.93

11.	7	Opel Zafira	13.27%	1.704

12.	9	Hyundai Matrix	15.17%	1.696

13.	16	Renault New Scenic	10.43%	1.322

14.	19	Opel Combo	10.90%	1.106

15.	19	Citroёn Berlingo	8.06%	0.892

16.	18	Seat Altea XL	6.64%	0.867

17.	11	Kia Carens	6.64%	0.729

18.	~	Citroёn Berlingo First	6.16%	0.641

19.	20	Citroёn Nemo	6.64%	0.639

20.	19	Peugeot Bipper Tepee	5.69%	0.629

21.	17	Chery Karry	4.27%	0.558

22.	12	Opel Meriva	2.84%	0.292

23.	19	Fiat Fiorino Qubo	2.37%	0.279

24.	13	Daihatsu Materia	3.32%	0.260

25.	14	Fiat Fiorino Combi	2.84%	0.231

26.	19	Seat Altea	1.42%	0.130

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2011, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Minivan / Family car (MPV)”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2011, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.