Minivan / Family car (MPV) :: Consumers survey results of 2012

Consumers survey results of 2012 in category

Cars: Minivan / Family car (MPV)

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Mazda 5	34.62%	5

2.	3	Skoda Roomster	30.77%	4.53

3.	2	Volkswagen Touran	28.85%	4.24

4.	6	Fiat Doblò	23.08%	3.27

5.	7	Volkswagen Caddy Life	15.38%	2.61

6.	5	Ford Fusion	19.23%	2.49

7.	4	Volkswagen Golf Plus	17.31%	2.33

8.		Ford C-MAX	13.46%	1.70

9.		Peugeot Partner Tepee	9.62%	1.57

10.	22	Opel Meriva	11.54%	1.50

11.		Opel Zafira	11.54%	1.40

12.	17	Kia Carens	7.69%	1.12

13.	10	Citroёn C4 Picasso	9.62%	1.10

14.	15	Citroёn Berlingo	5.77%	0.97

15.	12	Hyundai Matrix	5.77%	0.93

16.	18	Citroёn Berlingo First	3.85%	0.67

17.	14	Opel Combo	3.85%	0.60

18.	19	Citroёn Nemo	3.85%	0.52

18.	16	Seat Altea XL	3.85%	0.52

20.		BYD M6	1.92%	0.33

20.	23	Fiat Fiorino Qubo	1.92%	0.33

20.	26	Seat Altea	1.92%	0.33

23.	25	Fiat Fiorino Combi	1.92%	0.27

24.	21	Chery Karry	1.92%	0.19

24.	20	Peugeot Bipper Tepee	1.92%	0.19

24.	13	Renault New Scenic	1.92%	0.19

–.	24	Daihatsu Materia	0.00%	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2012, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Minivan / Family car (MPV)”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2012, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.