Olives :: Consumers survey results of 2016

Consumers survey results of 2016 in category

Preserved food / Olives

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Iberica (Olive line)	50.90%	5

2.		Diva Oliva (Veld)	31.90%	3.50

3.	4	Maestro de Oliva (Olive line)	24.01%	2.63

4.	5	Mikado (Мірель Компані)	19.71%	1.8235

5.	3	Oscar (Olive line)	18.64%	1.8228

6.		VivaOliva	15.41%	1.5757

7.		Чемпіон	13.26%	1.3557

8.	10	Lorado (Ист Лайн)	10.39%	1.0423

9.		ITLV	6.81%	0.8258

10.	12	Exoliva	6.81%	0.7878

11.	8	Coopoliva (Торговий Дім «Ліко»)	7.53%	0.7873

12.	19	Borges (Store Food Distribution Ltd)	6.45%	0.7193

13.	15	Bandolero	5.38%	0.5877

14.	11	Delphi (Conril)	4.66%	0.5780

15.	13	Lorelle (Мірель Компані)	5.02%	0.5218

16.	17	Acorsa (Lan-Ukraine)	3.23%	0.4695

17.		Ellada (Olive line)	4.66%	0.4640

18.	22	Furor (Кречет)	2.51%	0.3137

19.	16	Acenorca	3.23%	0.3133

20.	18	Матадор	1.79%	0.3128

21.		Excelencia (Іллегант)	2.87%	0.2640

22.	20	Best Time (Bestcom)	2.87%	0.2550

23.	14	Каlimera (Conril)	1.79%	0.2048

24.	23	LaHuerta (Кречет)	1.43%	0.1631

25.	24	San Eduardo (Veld)	1.08%	0.1061

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2016, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Olives”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2016, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.