Personal computer :: Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2012

The category has been excluded from the voting of January 7, 2015 by decision of organizers of the “Favorites of Success” Award, and it’s currently inactive. Here are shown an old survey results for 2012.

Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2012 in category

Office appliances / Personal computer

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	2	Acer	45.45%	5

2.	3	Apple iMac	36.36%	4

2.	8	Apple Mac pro	36.36%	4

4.	7	Dell Inspiron	18.18%	2

4.	1	HP	18.18%	2

4.		Impression	18.18%	2

4.	5	Квазар-Микро Advantis	18.18%	2

4.		МКС Neo’S	18.18%	2

9.	7	Apple Mac mini	9.09%	1

9.	10	BMS Flagman	9.09%	1

9.	3	Bravo (K-Trade)	9.09%	1

9.	~	Delfics	9.09%	1

9.		Delfics Green	9.09%	1

9.	8	Dell OptiPlex	9.09%	1

9.	~	Dell Vostro	9.09%	1

9.	7	Квазар-Микро Oscar	9.09%	1

–.		BMS Artist	0.00%	0

–.		BMS Favorite	0.00%	0

–.		DiaWest Base I	0.00%	0

–.	5	DiaWest GAME Pro IW	0.00%	0

–.		DiaWest UNIVERSAL A	0.00%	0

–.		everest® Enterprise 5000	0.00%	0

–.	9	everest® Enterprise 7000	0.00%	0

–.		everest® Terminal	0.00%	0

–.	8	Fujitsu	0.00%	0

–.	9	PrimePC	0.00%	0

–.	6	АМИ	0.00%	0

–.		Версия IXTerra	0.00%	0

–.		Версия Lite	0.00%	0

–.		Версия Pro	0.00%	0

–.	10	Версия Ultra	0.00%	0

–.		МКС AMADEY	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2012, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.