Personal computer :: Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2014

The category has been excluded from the voting of January 7, 2015 by decision of organizers of the “Favorites of Success” Award, and it’s currently inactive. Here are shown an old survey results for 2014.

Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2014 in category

Office appliances / Personal computer

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	2	HP	83.33%	5

2.	1	ASUS	33.33%	2

3.		Acer	16.67%	1

3.		Apple iMac	16.67%	1

3.	4	Apple Mac mini	16.67%	1

3.	1	Apple Mac pro	16.67%	1

3.	~	BMS Favorite	16.67%	1

3.	4	Delfics Green	16.67%	1

3.	~	Dell Vostro	16.67%	1

3.	~	Fujitsu	16.67%	1

3.		Lenovo	16.67%	1

3.	~	АМИ	16.67%	1

–.		BMS Artist	0.00%	0

–.		BMS Flagman	0.00%	0

–.		Delfics	0.00%	0

–.	4	Dell Inspiron	0.00%	0

–.	4	Dell OptiPlex	0.00%	0

–.		DiaWest Base I	0.00%	0

–.	4	DiaWest GAME Pro IW	0.00%	0

–.		DiaWest UNIVERSAL A	0.00%	0

–.		everest® Enterprise 5000	0.00%	0

–.	3	everest® Enterprise 7000	0.00%	0

–.		everest® Terminal	0.00%	0

–.		Impression	0.00%	0

–.		Majesty	0.00%	0

–.		PrimePC	0.00%	0

–.		Версия IXTerra	0.00%	0

–.		Версия Lite	0.00%	0

–.		Версия Pro	0.00%	0

–.		Версия Ultra	0.00%	0

–.		Квазар-Микро Advantis	0.00%	0

–.	4	Квазар-Микро Oscar	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2014, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.