The medication from prostatitis :: The total survey results of 2010 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2010 by the integrated assestment in category

Gynecology, urology, nephrology / The medication from prostatitis

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		Простамол Уно (Berlin-Chemie Menarini)	5

2.		Вітапрост (Nizhpharm)	3.84

3.		Простамед (Dr. Gustav Klein)	2.00

4.	8	Простатон (Національна гомеопатична спілка)	1.58

5.	9	Іхтіол (Nizhpharm)	1.36

6.	13	Trianol (Sandoz)	0.93

7.	14	Медный всадник (Талион-А)	0.78

8.	5	ПростаНорм (ФармВілар)	0.69

–.	7	~~Гарбеол (Київський вітамінний завод)~~	~~0.67~~

9.	12	Афала (Materia Medica – Ukraine)	0.51

–.	11	~~Простагут (Schwabe)~~	~~0.47~~

10.	4	Простаплант (Schwabe)	0.345

–.	6	~~Простапол (Farmak)~~	~~0.336~~

11.	10	Хомвіо-Простан (Homviora Arzneimittel)	0.294

The competitor which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and the most successful Ukrainian medication of 2010 in the “The medication from prostatitis” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2010, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.