Refrigerator :: Consumers survey results of 2018

Consumers survey results of 2018 in category

Kitchen appliances and crockery / Refrigerator

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	2	LG	30.29%	5

2.	1	Samsung	28.85%	4.66

3.	4	Bosch	25.48%	4.52

4.	5	ATLANT	20.67%	3.47

5.	3	Whirlpool	19.71%	3.29

6.	12	Indesit	14.90%	2.48

7.		Electrolux	13.46%	2.17

8.	6	Liebherr	11.54%	1.892

9.	8	Zanussi	11.06%	1.889

10.	11	Siemens	10.10%	1.586

11.	9	Gorenje	8.65%	1.534

12.	10	Beko	7.69%	1.415

13.		Hitachi	6.73%	1.193

14.	17	Snaigė	8.17%	1.181

–.	15	~~Ardo~~	~~5.29%~~	~~1.014~~

15.	13	Hotpoint-Ariston	5.77%	1

16.	14	Panasonic	4.81%	0.833

17.	18	Toshiba	4.81%	0.671

18.	16	Sharp	3.37%	0.635

19.		Stinol	2.88%	0.596

20.		Candy	3.37%	0.493

21.		AEG	2.88%	0.467

22.	25	Delfa	2.40%	0.430

23.		Miele	2.88%	0.423

24.	27	Liberty	1.92%	0.377

25.	24	Daewoo	1.92%	0.360

26.		Kaiser	2.40%	0.352

27.		ERGO	0.96%	0.252

28.	22	Vestfrost	0.96%	0.203

29.		Freggia	0.48%	0.199

29.		Rotex	0.48%	0.199

31.	27	Teka	0.48%	0.071

–.		Haier	0.00%	0

–.		Mora	0.00%	0

–.		Shivaki	0.00%	0

–.		VICO	0.00%	0

–.		~~Fagor~~	~~0.00%~~	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2018, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Refrigerator”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2018, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.