Sanitary pads (for critical days) :: The total survey results of 2009 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2009 by the integrated assestment in category

Personal hygiene products / Sanitary pads (for critical days)

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		Always (Procter & Gamble)	5

2.		Kotex (Kimberly-Clark)	2.70

3.	6	Libresse (SCA Hygiene)	1.57

4.	3	Molped (Капрі-Трейд)	1.54

5.	11	fantasy FLIRT (Credo-Capital Ukraine)	1.09

6.	9	Bella (Белла-Трейд)	1.05

7.	5	Only You (Procter & Gamble)	0.80

8.	4	Naturella (Procter & Gamble)	0.66

9.	8	Carefree (Johnson & Johnson)	0.65

10.		Angels (U.P.P.)	0.21

–.	7	~~Every Day (Mega Disposables)~~	~~0.07~~

11.	~	Love Moon (Winalite)	0.0557

12.		Меггі (Кампарі)	0.0556

13.		Helen Harper (Ontex)	0.0530

14.		NORMAL Clinique (Credo-Capital Ukraine)	0.0505

15.		MeiTan	0.0185

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2009 in the “Sanitary pads” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2009, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.