Sausages :: Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2018

Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2018 in category

Meat products / Sausages

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Ятрань (М’ясокомбінат «Ятрань»)	40.00%	5

2.	3	Бащинський (Український Бекон)	35.79%	4.47

3.	2	Глобино (Глобинський м’ясокомбинат)	33.68%	4.21

4.		М’ясна гільдія (Житомирський м’ясокомбінат)	30.53%	3.82

5.	6	Алан	17.89%	2.24

6.	5	Родинна ковбаска	15.79%	1.97

6.	9	Ювілейний (М’ясокомбинат Ювілейний)	15.79%	1.97

8.		М’ясна весна (Торговий дім «М’ясна весна»)	8.42%	1.05

8.	7	Фарро (Кременчукм’ясо)	8.42%	1.05

10.		Ранчо	7.37%	0.92

10.		Укрпромпостач-95	7.37%	0.92

12.	15	Дмитрук	6.32%	0.79

12.	11	Добров (М’ясна фабрика «Фаворит плюс»)	6.32%	0.79

14.		Векка	5.26%	0.66

14.		Світ М’яса	5.26%	0.66

16.	15	Wudy (AIA – Agricola Italiana Alimentare S.p.A.)	4.21%	0.53

16.	8	БМК – Безлюдівський мясокомбінат	4.21%	0.53

16.	13	Вовчаньскі ковбаси	4.21%	0.53

16.		Продрезерв (М’ясне ремесло)	4.21%	0.53

20.		Гощанські ковбаси	3.16%	0.39

20.	14	Ле Філе (Натурпродукти)	3.16%	0.39

22.	15	Наталі (Бердянські ковбаси)	2.11%	0.26

22.	15	Спец Цех (Alan)	2.11%	0.26

24.	12	Ferax	1.05%	0.13

24.	12	Fitness format (Alan)	1.05%	0.13

–.	14	Ідекс	0.00%	0

–.		М’ясоlove (М’ясокомбінат «Ятрань»)	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2018, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.