Toilet cleaner :: Consumers survey results of 2014

Consumers survey results of 2014 in category

Cleaning products / Toilet cleaner

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Domestos (Unilever)	53.13%	5

2.		Туалетный утенок (SC Johnson)	46.88%	4.66

3.	4	Comet (Procter & Gamble)	25.78%	2.50

4.	3	Bref WC (Henkel Ukraine)	24.22%	2.49

5.	9	Cillit (Reckitt Benckiser)	14.84%	1.94

–.	5	~~Pursue (Amway Ukraine)~~	~~14.06%~~	~~1.78~~

6.	7	Frosch (Ректіс)	12.50%	1.38

7.	10	Сантрі – МилаМ (МілаМ)	7.03%	0.68

8.	11	Sano	7.03%	0.67

9.	8	Harpic (Reckitt Benckiser)	3.91%	0.51

10.	13	Sarma (Невская косметика)	6.25%	0.461

11.	17	Титан	3.91%	0.459

12.		Сантік (San Clean)	3.13%	0.337

13.	6	Біолайт (Науково-виробнича фірма Біолайт)	1.56%	0.302

14.	15	Чистюня (Ельфа)	3.13%	0.243

15.	20	Санітарний-Т (НоваХім)	3.13%	0.197

16.		Дэнди - туалет (DAKOS-T)	1.56%	0.127

17.	21	Dr. Max	0.78%	0.086

18.	19	Gruen Green (OPM)	0.78%	0.076

–.	21	Peak (Група «Евріка»)	0.00%	0

–.		Ratz Fatz (Чистый дом)	0.00%	0

–.	18	Rorax (Rektis)	0.00%	0

–.	14	Сантри – SAMA (SV)	0.00%	0

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2014, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Toilet cleaner”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2014, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.