Toilet cleaner :: Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2018

Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2018 in category

Cleaning products / Toilet cleaner

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Domestos (Unilever)	57.14%	5

2.		Туалетный утенок (SC Johnson)	42.86%	3.75

3.	5	Comet (Procter & Gamble)	24.29%	2.13

4.	3	Bref WC (Henkel Ukraine)	17.14%	1.50

5.	4	Frosch (Ректіс)	12.86%	1.13

5.	8	Sano	12.86%	1.13

7.		Cillit (Reckitt Benckiser)	11.43%	1

7.	8	Чистюня (Ельфа)	11.43%	1

9.	7	Sarma (Невская косметика)	10.00%	0.88

10.	5	Amway Home (Amway Ukraine)	4.29%	0.38

10.		L’Arbre Vert (Група компаній «ВВН» «ПРОГРУП»)	4.29%	0.38

10.	7	TURBOчист (Сирена)	4.29%	0.38

13.	~	Bellini (Техноформ Про)	2.86%	0.25

13.	7	Gruen Green (OPM)	2.86%	0.25

13.	9	Rorax (Rektis)	2.86%	0.25

13.	~	Tortilla (Сирена)	2.86%	0.25

13.	~	Сана (Бытпром)	2.86%	0.25

13.	9	Сантік (San Clean)	2.86%	0.25

13.	8	Сантрі – МилаМ (МілаМ)	2.86%	0.25

20.	6	Harpic (Reckitt Benckiser)	1.43%	0.13

20.		Lazuria gel (Denros LLC)	1.43%	0.13

20.	~	Tytan WC (Унія, трудовий кооператив)	1.43%	0.13

20.	~	Дэнди - туалет (DAKOS-T)	1.43%	0.13

20.	~	Санітарний-Т (НоваХім)	1.43%	0.13

20.	~	Сантри – SAMA (SV)	1.43%	0.13

20.	~	Сантри – Сана (Бытпром)	1.43%	0.13

–.	7	Peak (Група «Евріка»)	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2018, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.