Toilet paper :: The total survey results of 2007 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2007 by the integrated assestment in category

Household goods / Toilet paper

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.	2	Ніжний дотик (Фабрика санітарно-гігієничних виробів)	5

2.	1	Обухів (Київський картонно-паперовий комбінат)	4.63

3.		Zewa (SCA Hygiene)	3.25

4.		Kleenex (Kimberly-Clark)	2.33

5.	4	Кохавинка (Кохавинська паперова фабрика)	2.00

6.	10	Classic (Лориплюс)	1.60

7.	~	Katrin (Бетта)	1.40

8.	5	Ruta (Волиньголовпостач)	1.01

9.	8	Lotus	0.72

10.	13	Tento	0.64

11.	6	Малинські волошки	0.57

12.	11	Veltie	0.561

13.	14	Eco Line	0.555

14.	~	Crepto	0.513

15.	9	Альбатрос	0.209

16.	~	Lambi	0.115

16.	13	Mola	0.115

18.	7	AHA (Біосфера)	0.070

18.		Лори Плюс	0.070

20.	14	Klucze	0.024

20.	12	Любава	0.024

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2007 in the “Toilet paper” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2007, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.