Toilet paper :: Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2015

Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2015 in category

Household goods / Toilet paper

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Обухів (Київський картонно-паперовий комбінат)	66.13%	5

2.		Сніжна панда (Снежная Панда)	27.42%	2.07

3.	5	Кохавинка (Кохавинська паперова фабрика)	25.81%	1.95

4.	3	Ruta (Волиньголовпостач)	20.97%	1.59

4.	2	Zewa (SCA Hygiene)	20.97%	1.59

6.	4	Selpak (Біосфера)	12.90%	0.98

7.		Kleenex (Kimberly-Clark)	11.29%	0.85

8.	5	Диво (Київський картонно-паперовий комбінат)	8.06%	0.61

8.	9	Малинські волошки	8.06%	0.61

10.	8	Lotus	4.84%	0.37

11.	~	AHA (Біосфера)	3.23%	0.24

11.	~	Classic (Лориплюс)	3.23%	0.24

11.	6	Dnipro (Дніпропетровська паперова фабрика)	3.23%	0.24

11.		Fantasy (Чиста планета)	3.23%	0.24

15.		Fantee (Чиста планета)	1.61%	0.12

15.	9	Katrin (Бетта)	1.61%	0.12

15.	9	Lambi	1.61%	0.12

15.	~	Perla (Біосфера)	1.61%	0.12

15.		Soffione (Київський картонно-паперовий комбінат)	1.61%	0.12

15.	9	Veltie	1.61%	0.12

15.	6	Альбатрос	1.61%	0.12

15.	9	Гармонія	1.61%	0.12

15.	~	Попович (Снежная Панда)	1.61%	0.12

–.		Crepto	0.00%	0

–.	8	Eco Line	0.00%	0

–.		Klucze	0.00%	0

–.		Mola	0.00%	0

–.		prOK (Савсервіс)	0.00%	0

–.		Tento	0.00%	0

–.		Лори Плюс	0.00%	0

–.		Любава	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2015, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.