Tomato paste :: Consumers survey results of 2013

Consumers survey results of 2013 in category

Tomato products / Tomato paste

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Pomidora	56.03%	5

2.		Чумак	53.02%	4.61

3.		Руна (Луцьк Фудз)	30.17%	2.66

4.		Господарочка (ТД «Господарочка»)	15.52%	1.43

5.		Ніжин	10.78%	0.94

6.		С бабушкиной грядки (Агрофирма «Эврика»)	4.74%	0.37

7.		Генічаночка (Агрофірма імені Шевченка)	1.29%	0.34

8.	14	Пані Крістіна (Pani Kristina)	3.45%	0.33

9.	8	Сіньор Помідор	3.45%	0.32

10.		Щедрий кухар (Демидівський консервний завод)	3.45%	0.31

11.		Едим дома (Луцьк Фудз)	3.88%	0.30

12.	15	Рідний край (Луцьк Фудз)	3.45%	0.29

13.		Дари ланів (Hopak)	3.45%	0.27

14.	9	МакМай (Прайм-Продукт)	3.02%	0.255

15.	12	ВІКІ	3.02%	0.249

16.		Маринадо (Kernel-Trade)	0.86%	0.232

17.	6	Владам	1.29%	0.098

18.	7	Holiday (Pani Kristina)	1.29%	0.092

19.	11	Гурман	1.29%	0.087

20.	~	Щедрий Ярмарок (Албо група компаній)	0.86%	0.071

21.	17	Томаріо	0.86%	0.058

22.	16	Надежда	0.43%	0.029

22.	18	Найдис (Арго Лтд)	0.43%	0.029

–.		~~Славпродукт~~	~~0.00%~~	0

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2013 in the “Tomato paste” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2013, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.