Tomato paste :: Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2018

Consumers survey results of for 1 quarter of 2018 in category

Tomato products / Tomato paste

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Чумак	67.26%	5

2.	3	Pomidora	25.66%	1.91

2.	4	Господарочка (ТД «Господарочка»)	25.66%	1.91

4.	2	Руна (Луцьк Фудз)	18.58%	1.38

5.	6	Королівський смак	15.04%	1.12

6.	5	Хуторок (Техносервис Финанц)	12.39%	0.92

7.	8	Ніжин	10.62%	0.79

8.		Щедрий кухар (Демидівський консервний завод)	8.85%	0.66

9.	7	Кухар Рішельє (Gidrosend)	7.96%	0.59

10.		La Pasta (Рідний продукт)	7.08%	0.53

10.	8	ВІКІ	7.08%	0.53

12.	9	Маринадо (Kernel-Trade)	6.19%	0.46

13.	8	Гурман	5.31%	0.39

13.	~	МакМай (Прайм-Продукт)	5.31%	0.39

15.	11	Дари ланів (Hopak)	4.42%	0.33

15.	9	С бабушкиной грядки (Агрофирма «Эврика»)	4.42%	0.33

17.	~	ВиватТомат (Veld)	3.54%	0.26

17.	10	Едим дома (Луцьк Фудз)	3.54%	0.26

17.	7	Рідний край (Луцьк Фудз)	3.54%	0.26

20.	~	Holiday (Pani Kristina)	2.65%	0.20

20.	~	Генічаночка (Агрофірма імені Шевченка)	2.65%	0.20

20.	10	Пані Крістіна (Pani Kristina)	2.65%	0.20

23.	8	Наш продукт	1.77%	0.13

23.	~	Томаріо	1.77%	0.13

25.	~	Владам	0.88%	0.07

25.	~	Надежда	0.88%	0.07

25.	~	Найдис (Арго Лтд)	0.88%	0.07

–.	11	Щедрий Ярмарок (Албо група компаній)	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2018, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.