Trash bag :: The total survey results of 2018 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2018 by the integrated assestment in category

Household goods / Trash bag

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		Фрекен Бок (Біосфера)	5

2.		Мелочи жизни (Ergopack)	4.34

3.	4	Добра господарочка (Бетта)	2.89

4.	9	Paclan	2.66

5.	3	Помічниця (Л.Л.К)	1.47

6.		NOVAx (Ergopack)	1.38

7.		PROservice (Біосфера)	1.30

8.		Бонус+ (Біосфера)	1.17

9.	8	Fantee (Чиста планета)	1.06

10.	13	Grosik	0.95

11.	16	Viland	0.941

12.	11	Nicols (Біосфера)	0.940

13.	10	Чисто (Юатрейд)	0.448

14.	15	Гривня Петрівна (Біосфера)	0.358

15.	14	Домовичок (SKS-Pack)	0.319

16.	17	SuperBaba (SKS-Pack)	0.293

17.	7	prOK (Савсервіс)	0.242

18.	5	Domi (Ergopack)	0.225

19.	18	Jan	0.157

20.	19	К стиль	0.111

21.	12	Fino	0.099

–.	~	~~FBI (Біосфера)~~	~~0.038~~

The trade mark which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the best and most successful Ukrainian mark of 2018 in the “Trash bag” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2018, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.