Wet wipes :: Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2008

Consumers survey results of for 3 quarter of 2008 in category

Personal hygiene products / Wet wipes

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Herbalis (Онікс)	38.10%	5

2.	1	Smile (Біосфера)	25.40%	3.33

3.		L.O.C. Mini Wipes (Емвей Україна)	20.63%	2.71

4.	6	Лайт (Онікс)	19.05%	2.50

5.	3	Cleanic (Harper Hygienics)	14.29%	1.88

6.	3	Фрешка (Эколла)	11.11%	1.46

7.		ФрешБери (Біосфера)	9.52%	1.25

8.	5	Ozone (Invista Group)	7.94%	1.04

9.	8	Uni Extra (Біосфера)	6.35%	0.83

9.	4	Ніжний дотик (Фабрика санітарно-гігієничних виробів)	6.35%	0.83

11.		Freshmaker (Fulya Kozmetik)	4.76%	0.63

11.	5	Happiness (Firm Leda)	4.76%	0.63

11.	4	Nivea Intimo (Байєрсдорф Україна)	4.76%	0.63

11.	7	Я самая (Коттон клаб Украина)	4.76%	0.63

15.	8	Freshline	3.17%	0.42

15.	2	Heerbatis	3.17%	0.42

15.		Биокон	3.17%	0.42

15.	6	Незабудки (Деліта)	3.17%	0.42

19.	6	AquaSoft	1.59%	0.21

19.	8	Event fresh (AXXON Bulgaria Ltd)	1.59%	0.21

19.	8	fantasy FLIRT (Credo-Capital Ukraine)	1.59%	0.21

–.	7	~~Aroma Vital~~	~~1.59%~~	~~0.21~~

–.	5	~~Фуршет~~	~~1.59%~~	~~0.21~~

–.	6	Aroma (Арома Козметикс)	0.00%	0

–.	7	Hayat (Firm Leda)	0.00%	0

–.		Prestige	0.00%	0

–.		Wellwet (Rocio)	0.00%	0

–.	8	Ладушки (Деліта)	0.00%	0

–.		~~Белый подснежник~~	~~0.00%~~	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2008, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.