Asset management :: Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2012

The category has been excluded from the voting of January 30, 2013 by decision of organizers of the “Favorites of Success” Award, and it’s currently inactive. Here are shown an old survey results for 2012.

Consumers survey results of for 2 quarter of 2012 in category

Financial services / Asset management

The annual ratings by results of Consumers survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Delta-Capital	30.00%	5

1.	5	Magister	30.00%	5

3.	5	Autoalliance-XXI century	20.00%	3.33

3.	~	Dragon Asset Management	20.00%	3.33

–.	2	~~Energo-Invest~~	~~20.00%~~	~~3.33~~

5.	3	Astrum Investment Management	10.00%	1.67

5.	1	Brokbusinessinvest	10.00%	1.67

5.	~	Citadele Asset Management Ukraine	10.00%	1.67

5.	4	Inter Capital Group	10.00%	1.67

5.	4	KINTO	10.00%	1.67

5.		Management service	10.00%	1.67

5.	~	National reserve	10.00%	1.67

5.	4	Sigma-Invest	10.00%	1.67

5.	~	Univer Management	10.00%	1.67

–.	5	Art-Capital Management	0.00%	0

–.		Athena	0.00%	0

–.		Bonum Group	0.00%	0

–.	5	Concorde Asset Management	0.00%	0

–.		Effect	0.00%	0

–.		Foyil Asset Management Ukraine	0.00%	0

–.	4	INEKO Invest	0.00%	0

–.	5	NIKoil Ukraine	0.00%	0

–.		Pioglobal Ukraine	0.00%	0

–.		SEB EM Ukraine	0.00%	0

–.	2	TAS asset management	0.00%	0

–.	5	TASK-Invest	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2012, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.