Internet banking :: The total survey results of 2014 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2014 by the integrated assestment in category

Financial services / Internet banking

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Consumers (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		Приват24 (PrivatBank)	5

2.	7	ПУМБ online	3.13

3.		Platinum Click	2.29

4.	6	OTP Bank	2.16

5.	4	Альфа-Банк	1.63

6.	2	StarAccess (UkrSibbank)	1.27

7.	5	Дельта Банк	1.12

8.		Діамант банк	0.77

9.		Райффайзен Банк Аваль	0.66

10.		UniCredit Bank	0.54

11.	13	Сбербанк ОнЛ@айн	0.32

12.	11	Universal Bank	0.17

–.	10	~~VAB 24~~	~~0.12~~

13.	19	Idea Online	0.07

14.	~	ProCredit Bank	0.06

–.	~	~~Південкомбанк~~	~~0.06~~

14.	12	Укргазбанк	0.064

16.	14	Укрэксимбанк	0.060

17.	12	Free Bank	0.038

17.	16	Кредобанк	0.038

19.	15	ING Bank Ukraine	0.021

19.	18	WinBank (Piraeus Bank)	0.021

–.	17	Eurogazbank	0

–.		СЕБ Банк	0

The competitor which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the most successful Ukrainian web-site of 2014 in the “Internet banking” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2014, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.