Language translation service :: The total survey results of 2016 by the integrated assestment

The total survey results of 2016 by the integrated assestment in category

B2B-services / Language translation service

Integrated, “absolute” ratings is calculated by survey results of 3 respondent groups.

	Public (40%)
	Experts (40%)
	Celebrities (20%)

The Favorites of the Year is determined by the Consumers (non-indifferent public), Experts (authoritative specialists of this market industry) and Celebrities Jury (known public figures and celebrities).

In forming of the integrated ratings, the following weight is assumed:

Absolute rank = (average yearly rank of Consumers × 0.4) + (rank of Experts × 0.4) + (rank of Celebrities × 0.2).

1.		FTB translation	5

2.	3	Лінго	2.95

3.	4	Tris	2.41

3.	2	Профпереклад	2.41

5.	9	Native Speaker Translation	2.05

6.	~	TraDos	1.61

6.	19	Азбука	1.61

8.		L-agency	1.52

9.	14	ЛЕВ	1.43

10.	16	LinguaPlus	1.34

10.	5	Пілігрим	1.34

12.	8	All translations	1.25

13.	17	Траст	1.16

14.	12	АвентА	1.07

14.		Лінгвістичний центр Literra	1.07

16.	6	Lingo service	0.89

16.	15	Shams	0.89

16.	7	Ексленг	0.89

16.	9	Апрель	0.89

20.	11	Рамзес	0.80

21.		Glebov	0.54

22.	18	Слоган	0.45

22.	10	Універсал	0.45

24.	13	Алфавіт	0.36

25.		TAT Center	0.27

26.	18	Bridge	0.18

The competitor which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the most successful Ukrainian company of 2016 in the “Language translation service” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2016, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.