Female singer :: Public survey results of for 4 quarter of 2013

Public survey results of for 4 quarter of 2013 in category

Show business / Female singer

The annual ratings by results of an Internet auditory survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Aida Nikolaychuk	39.00%	5

2.		Ani Lorak	26.76%	3.43

3.	1	Zlata Ognevich	22.00%	2.82

4.	5	Yolka	16.33%	2.09

5.	6	Tina Karol	11.11%	1.42

6.		Irina Borisyuk	10.66%	1.37

7.	8	Vera Brezhneva	9.98%	1.28

8.	3	Alyosha	9.75%	1.25

9.	17	Sofia Rotaru	9.52%	1.22

10.	8	Natalia Mogilevskaya	9.30%	1.19

11.	15	Ruslana Lyzhichko	7.48%	0.96

12.	11	Iryna Bilyk	5.90%	0.76

12.	11	Jamala	5.90%	0.76

14.	20	Lama	5.44%	0.70

15.	13	Antonina Matvienko	5.22%	0.67

15.	9	Masha Sobko	5.22%	0.67

17.	15	Anastasiya Prikhodko	4.99%	0.64

17.	20	Katya Buzhynska	4.99%	0.64

19.		Nina Matvienko	4.76%	0.61

20.	18	Taisia Povaliy	4.54%	0.58

21.	7	Erika	3.85%	0.49

21.		LAYAH (Eva Bushmina)	3.85%	0.49

23.	12	Eugenia Vlasova	3.17%	0.41

24.	12	Mila Nytych	2.95%	0.38

24.	4	Yana Solomko	2.95%	0.38

26.	23	Natalia Buchynska	2.72%	0.35

27.	17	Anna Sedokova	2.49%	0.32

27.	22	Illaria	2.49%	0.32

27.	12	Svetlana Loboda	2.49%	0.32

30.	17	Gaitana	2.27%	0.29

31.	22	Olga Polyakova	2.04%	0.26

32.	23	Irena Karpa	1.81%	0.23

33.	23	Lavika	1.59%	0.20

34.		Anna Zavalska	1.36%	0.17

34.		Galina Bezruk	1.36%	0.17

34.	20	Maria Burmaka	1.36%	0.17

34.	23	Natalia Valevskaya	1.36%	0.17

34.	~	Natalka Karpa	1.36%	0.17

34.	18	Pyltsa	1.36%	0.17

34.		Tania BerQ	1.36%	0.17

34.	22	Yaroslava	1.36%	0.17

42.	23	Aurora	1.13%	0.15

42.	19	Svetlana Tarabarova	1.13%	0.15

44.		Angelina Zavalska	0.91%	0.12

44.	23	Assia Akhat	0.91%	0.12

44.	23	Marta	0.91%	0.12

44.	20	Masha GoYa	0.91%	0.12

44.	22	Myata	0.91%	0.12

49.	23	Anzhelika Rudnytska	0.68%	0.09

49.	23	Arina Domski	0.68%	0.09

49.	~	Katya Chilly	0.68%	0.09

49.	23	Lilu	0.68%	0.09

49.	~	Olya Tsybulskaya	0.68%	0.09

49.	~	Zhanna Bodnaruk	0.68%	0.09

55.		AngeliyA	0.45%	0.06

55.	23	Anna Buraya	0.45%	0.06

55.	~	Anna Sergeevna	0.45%	0.06

55.	~	Eva	0.45%	0.06

55.	~	Irina Skazina	0.45%	0.06

55.	~	Katya Popova	0.45%	0.06

55.	7	Larisa Gord’iera	0.45%	0.06

55.	23	Nadin	0.45%	0.06

55.	~	Natalia Morozova	0.45%	0.06

55.	22	Sonya Sotnyk	0.45%	0.06

55.	22	TaLila	0.45%	0.06

55.	~	Tereza Frank	0.45%	0.06

55.		VARDA	0.45%	0.06

55.	23	Yulia Nelson	0.45%	0.06

55.	16	Yulia Voice	0.45%	0.06

55.	~	Yuliya Roma	0.45%	0.06

71.	~	Alla Popova	0.23%	0.03

71.	22	Inna Voronova	0.23%	0.03

71.	20	Irina Rosenfeld	0.23%	0.03

71.	~	Kamaliya	0.23%	0.03

71.	23	Marina Odolskaya	0.23%	0.03

71.	~	Maya Migal	0.23%	0.03

71.	23	MilosskayA (Oksana Bryzgalova)	0.23%	0.03

71.		Nadezhda Shestak	0.23%	0.03

71.	23	Natanika	0.23%	0.03

71.	~	Natasha Turbina	0.23%	0.03

71.	~	Oksana Pekun	0.23%	0.03

71.	~	Oksana Voyage	0.23%	0.03

71.	21	Olesya Kirichuk	0.23%	0.03

71.	~	Olga Kryukova	0.23%	0.03

71.	~	Sabina Baysakova	0.23%	0.03

71.	23	shalimova	0.23%	0.03

71.		Tanya Dyachenko	0.23%	0.03

71.	23	Tatiana Nedelskaya	0.23%	0.03

71.	23	Tatiana Terekhova	0.23%	0.03

71.	23	Yuliya Raj	0.23%	0.03

–.		Ivanna Melay	0.00%	0

–.		Maria Litti	0.00%	0

–.		Marianna Petrushevskaya	0.00%	0

–.		Nastya Markova	0.00%	0

–.		Natalia Volkova	0.00%	0

–.	23	Oksamita	0.00%	0

–.	23	Oksi	0.00%	0

–.	23	Olga Yunakova	0.00%	0

–.	23	Tanya Bryantseva	0.00%	0

–.	23	Tatiana Piskareva	0.00%	0

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2013, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.