TV-show host :: Public survey results of 2010

Public survey results of 2010 in category

Show business / TV-show host

The annual ratings by results of an Internet auditory survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Vladimir Zelenskiy	44.89%	5

2.	6	Sergey Pritula	40.90%	4.34

3.	7	Andrey Domanskiy	37.44%	4.14

4.	8	Olexandr Pedan	36.22%	3.82

5.	3	Yuriy Gorbunov	29.81%	3.44

6.	2	Dmitro Shepelev	25.48%	2.89

7.	4	Igor Kondratyuk	20.62%	2.37

8.	5	Andriy Kuzmenko	18.20%	2.03

9.		Dmitriy Kolyadenko	15.60%	1.78

10.		Savik Shuster	10.23%	1.18

11.	12	Pavlo Shilko (aka DJ-Pasha)	10.40%	1.17

12.	11	Eugen Kosheviy	9.36%	0.96

13.		Yuriy Kot	4.68%	0.57

14.	19	Bogdan Benuk	3.29%	0.45

15.		Ostap Stupka	2.43%	0.33

16.	14	Zhenya Galich	2.77%	0.30

17.	20	Pavel Kostitsyn	2.95%	0.28

18.	21	Miroslav Kuvaldin	1.73%	0.200

19.	23	Illya Noyabrev	1.56%	0.197

20.	17	Igor Posypayko	1.56%	0.167

21.	16	Anatoly Borsyuk	1.39%	0.144

22.	18	Slava Varda	0.87%	0.110

23.		Andrey Bogranovich	1.04%	0.106

24.		Dmitriy Chekalkin	0.87%	0.087

25.	26	Slava Govorun	0.52%	0.072

26.	22	Viktor Andrienko	0.52%	0.062

27.	25	Dmytro Oskin	0.35%	0.044

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2010, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “TV-show host”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2010, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.