Young talent :: Public survey results of 2010

Public survey results of 2010 in category

Show business / Young talent

The annual ratings by results of an Internet auditory survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.	2	Boris Aprel (34 years)	26.11%	5

–.	5	~~Masha Sobko (34 years)~~	~~8.92%~~	~~4.42~~

2.		Tanya Vorzheva (36 years)	19.36%	3.85

3.	1	Andranik Alexanyan (26 years)	14.14%	2.82

4.	13	Marietta Ways (29 years)	10.70%	2.52

5.	6	Alina Grosu (29 years)	11.97%	2.51

6.	11	Слава Колодяжний (35 years)	12.87%	2.23

7.	10	Vika Petryk (27 years)	8.41%	1.51

8.		Assol (30 years)	7.13%	1.45

9.		XENA	3.31%	1.19

10.		Lissa Wassabi (32 years)	3.57%	0.79

11.	9	Anna Mukhina	3.44%	0.75

12.		Viktor Melnik (48 years)	2.42%	0.49

13.	15	Olga Kovalskaya (25 years)	1.78%	0.35

14.		Ilona Galytska (29 years)	1.66%	0.34

15.	7	Maria Nechitaylo (32 years)	1.40%	0.263

16.		Renata Shtifel (31 years)	1.15%	0.261

17.		Olya Timoshenko	0.89%	0.201

18.	17	Mia Krumshin (35 years)	0.89%	0.181

–.	~	~~Алла Івашина (33 years)~~	~~0.25%~~	~~0.175~~

19.		MaSha GoYa (37 years)	0.25%	0.160

20.	16	Vadim Pankratov	0.64%	0.133

21.	18	Mary-Mishel (28 years)	0.51%	0.103

The participant which took the 1st place in this rating is by opinion of Ukrainian consumers is the best choice in 2010, recommendation of consumers #1 in the category “Young talent”.

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2010, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.