Young talent :: Public survey results of 2012

Public survey results of 2012 in category

Show business / Young talent

The annual ratings by results of an Internet auditory survey calculated as average arithmetic mean rank, obtained in each of 4 quarters of year.

	I quarter (january—march)
	II quarter (april—june)
	III quarter (july—september)
	IV quarter (october—december)

1.		Vika Petryk (27 years)	31.38%	5

2.		Maria Stasyuk (29 years)	28.19%	4.41

3.	4	Alina Grosu (29 years)	21.31%	3.37

4.	6	Andranik Alexanyan (26 years)	19.46%	3.11

–.	3	~~Boris Aprel (33 years)~~	~~17.28%~~	~~2.60~~

5.		Tanya Vorzheva (35 years)	16.28%	2.42

6.	7	Assol (30 years)	13.09%	2.02

7.		Svetlana Vinnik	9.40%	1.63

8.	10	Renata Shtifel (31 years)	8.72%	1.40

9.	8	Lissa Wassabi (32 years)	7.21%	1.25

10.	9	Marietta Ways (28 years)	6.38%	1.20

–.	11	~~MaSha GoYa (37 years)~~	~~4.87%~~	~~1.18~~

–.		~~Світлана Тарабарова~~	~~1.51%~~	~~0.46~~

11.	18	Maria Nechitaylo (32 years)	2.35%	0.32

12.	14	Anna Mukhina	1.68%	0.264

13.	12	Viktor Melnik (48 years)	1.68%	0.260

14.	19	XENA	1.17%	0.200

15.	13	Ilona Galytska (29 years)	1.34%	0.197

16.	21	Mia Krumshin (35 years)	1.17%	0.152

17.	15	Olga Kovalskaya (25 years)	0.84%	0.1190

18.	16	Olya Timoshenko	0.84%	0.1187

18.	22	Vadim Pankratov	0.67%	0.1187

20.		Mary-Mishel (28 years)	0.50%	0.0816

21.	17	Emadeja (37 years)	0.34%	0.0595

The competitor which has taken 1st place in this rating — is the most successful Ukrainian person of 2012 in the “Young talent” category!

Using this rating is only possible with obligatory link to the source.

This rating was built as a result of the study of social preferences in 2012, under the “Favorites of Success” Contest in Ukraine and it’s the free information. In case of full or partial republishing of the information drawn from this rating, it is obligatory to mention the name of the “Favorites of Success” Contest in printed publications, or put an active hyperlink to this page in the electronic media.

Advanced reporting booklet about the study, including demographics of the respondents, by regional breakdown, information roll-call of ad hoc judges etc, can also be obtained from managers of the contest.